How this site is made
Every page here states where its facts came from. This page states where the site itself came from, which is the same question asked one level up.
This site is published by Slimtidedaily, a U.S. stocking partner for Slimtide. It is not the manufacturer: the label names Instituto Experience of Lakeland, Florida as the distributor, and nothing on this site was written by them or shown to them.
The method is three rules. Every fact comes off the label or a cited source. Where the written pack and the artwork disagree, the artwork wins and the disagreement is printed. Where nothing was supplied, the page says nothing was supplied rather than filling the gap.
Who publishes this, and who does not
Three separate organisations are involved in this bottle and only one of them wrote this website.
A supplement is rarely made, distributed and sold by the same people, and a reader deciding how much weight to give a page needs to know which of them is talking. On this product the answer is unusually easy to check, because the label prints part of it.
| Who | What they are | What they wrote |
|---|---|---|
| Slimtidedaily | U.S. stocking partner for Slimtide, operating this website from 461 Fifth Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY 10017, USA. | This website, in full. Every judgement, every audit and every sentence of criticism on it. |
| Instituto Experience | Named on the bottle under DISTRIBUTED BY, at Lakeland FL, 33804. No street line is printed. | The label. Nothing on this site. |
| The manufacturer | Not named anywhere on the artwork or in the pack. The label says only “Made in the USA with globally sourced ingredients”. | Nothing that was supplied to this site. |
Scroll this table sideways →
One thing the table cannot tell you
No street line appears under the distributor’s name. Lakeland, Florida, 33804 is a city, a state and a ZIP code, and it is not an address anything could be posted to.
That is recorded here because it is the kind of gap a reader should notice for themselves on any bottle, and because this site has a return address of its own that is a street address. The two are different things and the contact page keeps them apart.
The method, in three rules
They are short enough to check a page against, which is the point of writing them down.
Every fact comes off the label or a cited source
Three declared amounts, an ingredient list, storage, a caution and a distributor came off the artwork. Every published target this site compares them with — 12 g of chicory inulin, 28 g of fibre, the conditions on pasteurised Akkermansia — belongs to a regulator and is linked in full on the sources page.
Where the pack and the artwork disagree, the artwork wins
Two documents describe this product and they do not always match. The artwork is what a buyer holds in their hand, so it governs. Every disagreement found is printed in a table on the label page rather than quietly resolved.
Where nothing was supplied, the page says so
No price, no shipping cost, no delivery estimate, no CFU count, no strain designation, no certificate of analysis and no expiry date were supplied. Each of those is written as an absence wherever it is relevant, in those words.
Nothing is estimated to fill a hole
There is no starting organism count and no stability data for this product, so this site publishes no figure for what survives in the post. A modelled number would look exactly like a measured one, which is precisely the problem with it.
Every source was opened before it was cited
Nothing here cites a document that was not read, and no identifier on this site was written from memory. The sources page carries the full list with links.
The rules are not a style guide. They are the reason this site is able to say that one capsule is about one fifty-seventh of an authorised intake, and to say it on a page that also sells the capsule.
The affiliate relationship, in the seller’s own words
It is printed on every page of this site. Here is what it means and how you can check it was honoured.
The disclosure that appears in the footer of every page reads in full:
The affiliate disclosure
Slimtidedaily is a stocking partner for this product. If you buy through this site we may be paid for the sale. It has not changed a figure on this site, and the arithmetic below is the evidence of that: it is not flattering.
The second half of that sentence is the part worth testing, because a disclosure that cannot be tested is decoration. The test is available on this site and it is arithmetic.
- The claim
- That being paid for a sale has not changed a figure on this site.
- The evidence
- The panel declares 211 mg of chicory root inulin. Regulation (EU) 2015/2314 authorises the chicory inulin bowel-function claim only for food providing 12 g a day. Twelve grams divided by 211 mg is 56.9, so 57 capsules a day — and the label says do not exceed one.
- Why that is the evidence
- It is the single most damaging true sentence anyone could write about this product’s fibre content, and it is on the front page, in a widget, with the division shown. A site that adjusted its figures for the sake of the commission would have adjusted that one first.
- The second piece of it
- Against FDA’s 28 g Daily Value for dietary fibre, one capsule is 0.75% of a day, which is inside the band FDA itself calls low. That figure is printed too, in the same places.
- And the third
- The most saleable material in the pack — a 4.5 score, 1,169 reviews and 5,319 orders — was refused entirely. Publishing it would have cost nothing and sold more.
None of that makes the relationship disappear. This site is paid if you buy through it, and that is a reason to read it sceptically rather than a reason not to. What the arithmetic shows is what the money did not buy.
The editorial rules actually followed
Not aspirations. Each one has a visible consequence somewhere on this site, and the consequence is named.
| The rule | Where you can see it was followed |
|---|---|
| No price is printed that was not supplied | The pricing page carries pack sizes and no prices, and the Product structured data on this site carries no offers block at all. |
| No customer rating, review or order count is published | The reviews page publishes none of the five figures supplied, and no Review or AggregateRating markup is emitted anywhere. |
| No supplied image that makes an unevidenced claim is published | Six images were refused and the list is generated from the build itself rather than written by hand. |
| No study, journal, identifier or URL is invented | Eight citations exist on this site. Every one is linked in full and every one was opened while the page citing it was written. |
| No weight-loss outcome is promised | FTC’s guidance says weight loss without a change in diet or exercise is always a false claim. The label’s own claims are quoted as claims, with their asterisk, and never as effects. |
| No lot code or CoA reference is presented as laboratory proof | The lot SLI-26/SL-7735 and the CoA reference SLI-7735-26-SL are described on the batch page as draft label references, in those words, on every page that mentions them. |
| No medical advice | Every page that touches safety says to ask a clinician, and the safety pages quote what NIH records rather than what this site thinks. |
Scroll this table sideways →
The pattern is the same in every row. A rule that only exists as a sentence about ourselves is worth very little; a rule with a missing price, a missing star rating or a missing offers block attached to it can be checked by anybody in a browser.
Who writes it, and when it was last checked
- Written and reviewed by
- Written and reviewed by the Slimtidedaily Editorial Desk
- Last checked
- September 24, 2026
- What a review pass involves
- Re-opening every cited source, re-reading the label flat at full resolution, and re-running the arithmetic from the declared amounts rather than from the numbers already printed on the page.
- What it does not involve
- Any contact with the manufacturer or the distributor. Nothing on this site was approved by either, and nothing was written at their request.
- Medical review
- None. No clinician has reviewed this site, and no clinician is named on it. The “Doctor Formulated” mark on the bottle came with no name, credential or role either, which is recorded on the quality-marks page.
The absence of a named clinician is stated here rather than left to be inferred. A supplement site that implies medical review without having had any is doing the thing this site spends seven pages objecting to.
How to tell us we are wrong
The useful version of this section is the one that says what happens after you send it.
If a figure on this site is wrong, it is wrong on a page that argues from figures, and it should be fixed. The route is the website inbox, [email protected], which is read monday to friday, 9:00am to 5:00pm eastern time.
Send the page and the sentence
The URL and the sentence you are disputing. A page on this site can run to two thousand words and a correction that identifies neither takes longer to place than to make.
Say what the right figure is, and where it comes from
A label photograph, a regulation, a certificate or a published page. This site cannot replace one unsourced number with another unsourced number, and would not be improved by it.
Expect a reply from a person during office hours
The inbox is [email protected] and it is answered monday to friday, 9:00am to 5:00pm eastern time. It cannot see orders, so a correction and an order question have to go to different places.
Watch for the change and the date
Every page carries a last-updated date. If a correction is accepted, the date moves and the corrected sentence is the one you will find there.
What we will not do with a correction
Remove a finding because it is unflattering. The arithmetic on this site belongs to the people who published the targets, and it does not change because somebody would prefer a different answer.
Add a figure because somebody told us it privately. A colony-forming count or a strain designation is welcome and would change several pages here — but it has to be published somewhere a reader can reach, not asserted in an email.
See the SlimTide packs
One, three or six bottles. The price is on the seller’s checkout page, because it is one of the few figures this site was never given — and a figure we were not given is not a figure we will print.
Shipping cost and delivery time were not supplied either, which matters more than usual on a product whose label asks for refrigeration. The guarantee is 60 days from purchase unless the sales page prints longer.
References
The sources behind the numbers on this page.
- Federal Trade CommissionGut Check: A Reference Guide for Media on Spotting False Weight Loss Claims · sourceThe claims FTC says are always false, beginning with weight loss of two pounds or more a week for a month or more without dieting or exercise.
- U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationDietary Supplement Labeling Guide, Chapter IV: Nutrition Labeling · sourceWhat a Supplement Facts panel must carry, and the proprietary-blend rule: the blend's total weight on its own line with the ingredients listed underneath in descending order of predominance by weight.
- European UnionCommission Regulation (EU) 2015/2314 of 7 December 2015 authorising a health claim made on foods · source“Chicory inulin contributes to normal bowel function by increasing stool frequency”, authorised only for food providing a daily intake of 12 g of native chicory inulin. The source of the 12 g figure used throughout this site.